Post by 3kmichael on Mar 9, 2015 3:48:22 GMT
espn.go.com/los-angeles/story/_/id/12182194/california-girls-high-school-basketball-coach-suspended-two-games-161-2-win
This is just a silly little article about a basketball coach being suspended for getting too high of a score. I am sure you heard of something about that a while ago, and only now I thought of it in a little more depth. Basically, the story goes, a girls basketball team wins a game with a score of 161-2. The coach of the team gets suspended, for embarrassing the other team, or something along those lines. While I am not a sports fan, I do know that there are certain morales installed in the world of "being a good sport," but this one had me questioning the morales, this concept of giving up one's power, something so natural, to accommodate societal standards.
By logic, if someone is good in this world, maybe too good for others, must that someone be punished? Yes, according to the morales society imposes on us.
A brilliant student, I don't know, named Rheanna or something, is shunned to be a show-off for being too smart in class. A talented dancer, with some random name like Maya is looked down upon by her peers when she exceeds them greatly. It is okay to be talented. It is not okay to be more than simply talented.
Is it truly the fault of those stronger that they are that way? In a society that treasures individuality, there is a double standard almost, the fear of being "too unique..."
Is it truly beneficial that we stay humble and suppress strength? I think that perchance society's suppression of the strong is often the very reason why humans progressed little in their abilities over the years, that is the very reason why today we still have to look up to works of people who lived centuries ago, because we might have stopped trying to be great. That is why geniuses are called insane, why we frown at those greater than us, we are envious and we loathe. Humility is important, kindness and modesty, yes, but to what extend must we allow it to overshadow the virtually limitless human potential?
This is just a silly little article about a basketball coach being suspended for getting too high of a score. I am sure you heard of something about that a while ago, and only now I thought of it in a little more depth. Basically, the story goes, a girls basketball team wins a game with a score of 161-2. The coach of the team gets suspended, for embarrassing the other team, or something along those lines. While I am not a sports fan, I do know that there are certain morales installed in the world of "being a good sport," but this one had me questioning the morales, this concept of giving up one's power, something so natural, to accommodate societal standards.
By logic, if someone is good in this world, maybe too good for others, must that someone be punished? Yes, according to the morales society imposes on us.
A brilliant student, I don't know, named Rheanna or something, is shunned to be a show-off for being too smart in class. A talented dancer, with some random name like Maya is looked down upon by her peers when she exceeds them greatly. It is okay to be talented. It is not okay to be more than simply talented.
Is it truly the fault of those stronger that they are that way? In a society that treasures individuality, there is a double standard almost, the fear of being "too unique..."
Is it truly beneficial that we stay humble and suppress strength? I think that perchance society's suppression of the strong is often the very reason why humans progressed little in their abilities over the years, that is the very reason why today we still have to look up to works of people who lived centuries ago, because we might have stopped trying to be great. That is why geniuses are called insane, why we frown at those greater than us, we are envious and we loathe. Humility is important, kindness and modesty, yes, but to what extend must we allow it to overshadow the virtually limitless human potential?