Post by 6dmaya on Jan 20, 2015 4:16:15 GMT
www.theguardian.com/film/2015/jan/19/russia-outlaws-film-national-unity-culture-leviathan
This article highlight a recent Russian policy change (or suggestion thereof) amounting to a requirement for films to be approved prior to their showing in any public theaters. The Russian government now has the ability to shield the public eye from that which is not favorable to the personal agendas of those in power. Personally, I see this as an extreme abuse of power, as it only truly forces a perspective that may not be entirely accurate. Not only is this a prime example of censorship, but also propaganda and to a certain extent, indoctrination. Those residing in Russia will be forced to have a limited expression outlet by means of art (film) and will have a limited ability to experience this art by viewing it. The mere concept of a film being outlawed due to its "defiling the culture" seems so absurd because it would be such a subjective decision. As discussed in the article, this then raises the question of who will be making these decisions and what grants them the authority to due so?
More than anything, this article served to remind me of the great importance of freedom of speech, press and expression. I think these liberties we are allowed as citizens of the United States are easily forgotten and taken for granted when we live in a world where not every individual has such power and freedom.
This article highlight a recent Russian policy change (or suggestion thereof) amounting to a requirement for films to be approved prior to their showing in any public theaters. The Russian government now has the ability to shield the public eye from that which is not favorable to the personal agendas of those in power. Personally, I see this as an extreme abuse of power, as it only truly forces a perspective that may not be entirely accurate. Not only is this a prime example of censorship, but also propaganda and to a certain extent, indoctrination. Those residing in Russia will be forced to have a limited expression outlet by means of art (film) and will have a limited ability to experience this art by viewing it. The mere concept of a film being outlawed due to its "defiling the culture" seems so absurd because it would be such a subjective decision. As discussed in the article, this then raises the question of who will be making these decisions and what grants them the authority to due so?
More than anything, this article served to remind me of the great importance of freedom of speech, press and expression. I think these liberties we are allowed as citizens of the United States are easily forgotten and taken for granted when we live in a world where not every individual has such power and freedom.
